Tóm tắt
Background: Early recovery after hand extensor tendon repair encompasses surgical-site condition, pain, and patient-reported well-being.
Objective: To describe clinical characteristics, early postoperative care outcomes, and quality of recovery following hand extensor tendon repair.
Materials and Methods: This prospective descriptive study included 35 patients undergoing hand extensor tendon repair at Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital between October 2025 and April 2026. Surgical-site status and pain were assessed on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 3, and 5; Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores were assessed on PODs 3 and 5. Paired scores were compared in 32 patients; three were discharged before POD 5. Exploratory associations with POD 5 recovery categories were examined using exact tests.
Results: Mean age was 37.74 ± 12.61 years; 65.7% were male. Forty-two extensor tendons were injured, most commonly in zone IV (28.6%). Dry surgical sites were recorded in 22.9% of patients assessed on POD 1 and 81.3% on POD 5. Among 32 patients assessed on POD 5, 53.1% reported no or mild pain and one (3.1%) had a superficial surgical-site infection. Paired mean QoR-15 scores increased from 112.69 ± 12.89 to 127.81 ± 12.05; the mean increase was 15.13 points (95% CI, 14.32 - 15.93; p < 0.001). On POD 5, 71.9% had good or excellent recovery and 28.1% had moderate recovery. Smoking history, comorbidity, surgical-site exudate or infection, and incomplete early mobilization were associated with moderate recovery (all p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Early inpatient observations showed favorable surgical-site and pain patterns, with improved paired QoR-15 scores. These findings do not establish long-term tendon healing or individual intervention effectiveness. Associations were exploratory and do not establish independent risk factors.
| Đã xuất bản | 15-11-2026 | |
| Toàn văn |
|
|
| Ngôn ngữ |
|
|
| Số tạp chí | Tập 16 Số S-3 (2026) | |
| Phân mục | Nghiên cứu | |
| DOI | 10.34071/jmp.2026.S-3.1 | |
| Từ khóa | Extensor tendons, hand injuries, postoperative care, quality of recovery, QoR-15 |
công trình này được cấp phép theo Creative Commons Attribution-phi thương mại-NoDerivatives 4.0 License International .
Bản quyền (c) 2026 Hue Journal of Medicine and Pharmacy
Nguyen Viet Tien. Plastic, aesthetic, and reconstructive surgery of the hand [in Vietnamese]. Hanoi: Medical Publishing House; 2018.
de Jong JP, Nguyen JT, Sonnema AJ, Nguyen EC, Amadio PC, Moran SL. The incidence of acute traumatic tendon injuries in the hand and wrist: a 10-year population-based study. Clin Orthop Surg. 2014;6(2):196-202.
Hoang Quoc Quan. Surgical outcomes of traumatic extensor tendon injuries of the hand at Viet Duc University Hospital [master’s thesis, in Vietnamese]. Hanoi: Hanoi Medical University; 2012.
Thieng Pisith, Ngo Van Toan, Nguyen Moc Son. Surgical outcomes of wrist and hand extensor tendon injuries at Viet Duc University Hospital [in Vietnamese]. Vietnam Med J. 2022;521(1):114-118.
Vu Hong Ai, Hoang Van Dung, Vu Manh Cuong, Nguyen Ngoc Sinh, Ta Van Cong. Surgical outcomes of hand extensor tendon lacerations at Thai Nguyen National Hospital [in Vietnamese]. Vietnam Med J. 2023;525(1A):158-162.
Tran Nhat Tien, Quang Huy Hoang. Outcomes of hand extensor tendon repair using the Becker technique [in Vietnamese]. Hue J Med Pharm. 2026;16(1):72-78.
Crouch M. Pain management in wound care: taking a holistic approach. Br J Nurs. 2025;34(20):S12-S17.
Carlsson AM. Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale. Pain. 1983;16(1):87-101.
Stark PA, Myles PS, Burke JA. Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-15. Anesthesiology. 2013;118(6):1332-1340.
Chazapis M, Walker EMK, Rooms MA, Kamming D, Moonesinghe SR. Measuring quality of recovery-15 after day case surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2016;116(2):241-248.
Trang NTT, Thosingha O, Chanruangvanich W. Factors associated with recovery among patients after abdominal surgery. Nurs Sci J Thail. 2017;35(3):4-12.
Kleif J, Gögenur I. Severity classification of the quality of recovery-15 score-an observational study. J Surg Res. 2018;225:101-107.
Myles PS, Myles DB, Galagher W, Chew C, MacDonald N, Dennis A. Minimal clinically important difference for three quality of recovery scales. Anesthesiology. 2016;125(1):39-45.
Guo S, DiPietro LA. Factors affecting wound healing. J Dent Res. 2010;89(3):219-229.
Grob M, Papadopulos NA, Zimmermann A, Biemer E, Kovacs L. The psychological impact of severe hand injury. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2008;33(3):358-362.
Berg K, Kjellgren K, Unosson M, Årestedt K. Postoperative recovery and its association with health-related quality of life among day surgery patients. BMC Nurs. 2012;11:24.