Abstract
Background: Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) is commonly implicated in persistent endodontic infections and has been identified as a major contributor to endodontic treatment failure. Due to the complex anatomy of the root canal system and the persistent bacterial colonization, mechanical preparation alone is often insufficient to completely eliminate bacteria and their toxins. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the antibacterial efficacy of endodontic irrigating solutions.
Objective: To evaluate and compare the antibacterial efficacy of 5.25% Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 2% Chlorhexidine (CHX), and a surfactant-modified 2% Chlorhexidine (CHX Plus™) against E. faecalis biofilms in an in vitro model.
Materials and Methods: An in vitro study was conducted on 66 human mandibular premolars, which were divided into four groups: 5.25% NaOCl, 2% CHX, 2% CHX Plus™, and a negative control group (0.9% NaCl). The root canals were prepared to a master apical file size of #40 and step-back to #80. The samples were inoculated with E. faecalis (ATCC 29212) and incubated for 7 days to allow early biofilm formation. The teeth were then irrigated, the remaining bacteria were collected, and bacterial counts were quantified by colony-forming unit (CFU/mL) enumeration. Data were analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests (p < 0.05).
Results: All experimental irrigants significantly reduced the bacterial load compared to the negative control group (p < 0.001). Both 5.25% NaOCl and 2% CHX Plus™ demonstrated significantly higher antibacterial activity compared to conventional 2% CHX (p < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was observed between the NaOCl and CHX Plus™ groups (p > 0.05), although NaOCl showed the lowest absolute residual bacterial counts.
Conclusion: All three solutions showed high antibacterial efficacy against E. faecalis. However, 2% CHX was less effective than 5.25% NaOCl and 2% CHX Plus™.
| Published | 2026-08-25 | |
| Fulltext |
|
|
| Language |
|
|
| Issue | Vol. 16 No. 04 (2026) | |
| Section | Original Articles | |
| DOI | 10.34071/jmp.2026.4.1052 | |
| Keywords | Biofilm, chlorhexidine, Enterococcus faecalis, sodium hypochlorite, antibacterial efficacy. |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Hue Journal of Medicine and Pharmacy
Zhang C, Du J, Peng Z. Correlation between Enterococcus faecalis and Persistent Intraradicular Infection Compared with Primary Intraradicular Infection: A Systematic Review. J Endod. 2015;41:1207–13.
Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Santos KRN. Association of Enterococcus faecalis with different forms of periradicular diseases. J Endod. 2004;30:315–20.
Siqueira JF, Rôças IN. Present status and future directions: Microbiology of endodontic infections. Int Endodontic J. 2022;55:512–30.
Maneea ASB, Alqahtani AD, Alhazzaa AK, Albalawi AO, Alotaibi AK, Alanazi TF. Microbiological Effect of Various Concentrations of Sodium Hypochlorite (NaOCL) During Endodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review. Annals of Dental Specialty. 2023;11:95–101.
Dương TH, Huỳnh PTN, Huỳnh CNN, Nguyễn TT, Phạm VK. Đánh giá hiệu quả sát khuẩn của dung dịch hlorhexidine 2% trên tủy răng hoại tử bằng kỹ thuật real – time PCR. VMJ. 2021;501.
Dametto FR, Ferraz CCR, Gomes BPF de A, Zaia AA, Teixeira FB, de Souza-Filho FJ. In vitro assessment of the immediate and prolonged antimicrobial action of chlorhexidine gel as an endodontic irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;99:768–72.
Lopes HP. Wettability of Irrigants used in Root Canal Treatment. Dentistry. 2015;05.
Qiao X, Xu T, Chen L, Yang D. Analysis of Root Canal Curvature and Root Canal Morphology of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Guizhou, China. Med Sci Monit. 2021;27:e928758-1-e928758-12.
Zehnder M. Root Canal Irrigants. Journal of Endodontics. 2006;32:389–98.
Berber VB, Gomes BPFA, Sena NT, Vianna ME, Ferraz CCR, Zaia AA, et al. Efficacy of various concentrations of NaOCl and instrumentation techniques in reducing Enterococcus faecalis within root canals and dentinal tubules. Int Endod J. 2006;39:10–7.
Ruksakiet K, Hanák L, Farkas N, Hegyi P, Sadaeng W, Czumbel LM, et al. Antimicrobial Efficacy of Chlorhexidine and Sodium Hypochlorite in Root Canal Disinfection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Endod. 2020;46:1032-1041.e7.
Jeansonne MJ, White RR. A Comparison of 2.0% Chlorhexidine Gluconate and 5.25% Sodium Hypochlorite As Antimicrobial Endodontic Irrigants, J Endod, 1994; 20(6): 276–278.
Mohammadi Z, Abbott PV. The properties and applications of chlorhexidine in endodontics. Int Endod J. 2009;42:288–302.
Arias-Moliz MT, Ferrer-Luque CM, Espigares-García M, Baca P. Enterococcus faecalis biofilms eradication by root canal irrigants. J Endod. 2009;35:711–4.
Bhasin P, Sharma M, Bindal D, Tomar D. An In Vitro Evaluation of Antimicrobial Effects of Three Different Root Canal Irrigating Solutions against Enterococcus faecalis and Streptococcus mutans. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2019;20:221–5.
Önçağ Ö, Hoşgör M, Hilmioğlu S, Zekioğlu O, Eronat C, Burhanoğlu D. Comparison of antibacterial and toxic effects of various root canal irrigants. Int Endodontic J. 2003;36:423–32.
Arias-Moliz MT, Ferrer-Luque CM, González-Rodríguez MP, Valderrama MJ, Baca P. Eradication of Enterococcus faecalis biofilms by cetrimide and chlorhexidine. J Endod. 2010;36:87–90.