Abstract
Background: Cleft lip and palate (CLP) significantly impacts aesthetics, function, and the psychological well-being of both the child and their family. Presurgical orthopedics, particularly the Nasoalveolar Molding (NAM) appliance, it reduces the width of the lip cleft, improves nasal symmetry, and enhances feeding function for the child. This study aims to evaluate the awareness, attitudes, and satisfaction levels of families of children with unilateral complete CLP treated with NAM appliances, providing insight into the psychosocial benefits of this therapy.
Materials and methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on 31 parents or caregivers of children diagnosed with unilateral complete CLP. Participants were recruited from Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital and Nghe An Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital between February 2022 and September 2024. Data on demographics, awareness, attitudes, and satisfaction were collected using a structured questionnaire administered through direct interviews after the completion of NAM therapy.
Results: Among the 31 infants, none were able to breastfeed at birth. After the first day of NAM appliance placement, 30 infants (96.8%) were able to bottle-feed successfully. All parents believed that NAM improved their child’s appearance and considered the orthodontist a key member of the CLP care team. Majority (96.8%) recognized that NAM improved feeding. However, 67.7% of families reported that their quality of life was affected by having a child with CLP. Regarding attitudes, 77.4% of families felt the infant experienced discomfort during the impression-taking process, yet 96.8% found the treatment useful for the child and 19.4% found frequent follow–up appointments to be time–consuming or inconvenient. Nonetheless, all were willing to encourage other parents to use NAM before surgery. The overall satisfaction rate was high, with 74.2% of families reporting being “completely satisfied” with the treatment results.
Conclusion: These findings underscore the importance of incorporating NAM into CLP care protocols and providing comprehensive support to families throughout the treatment process.
| Published | 2026-04-30 | |
| Fulltext |
|
|
| Language |
|
|
| Issue | Vol. 16 No. 02 (2026) | |
| Section | Original Articles | |
| DOI | 10.34071/jmp.2026.2.1091 | |
| Keywords | Nasoalveolar Molding (NAM), Presurgical Orthopedics, Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip and Palate, Parental Satisfaction, Quality of Life |

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Hue Journal of Medicine and Pharmacy
Hammond NL, Dixon MJ. Revisiting the embryogenesis of lip and palate development. Oral Dis. 2022 Jul;28(5):1306-1326.
Cleft information [Internet]. Vietnam: Cleft Vietnam; [cited 2026 Apr 6]. Available from: https://cleftvietnam.org/donor-information/cleft-information.html
Vietnam Ministry of Health. Joint Annual Health Review 2020. Hanoi: Ministry of Health; 2020.
Grayson BH, Garfinkle JS. Early cleft management: the case for nasoalveolar molding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014;145(2):134-142.
Stock NM, Blaso D, White P, Shepherd L, Costa B, Edme K, et al. Longitudinal psychological well-being in caregivers of young children with cleft lip and/or palate. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 2025 Sept;50(9):831–842.
Grayson BH, Cutting C, Wood R. Preoperative columella lengthening in bilateral cleft lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;92(7):1422-1423.
Chaisooktaksin N, Chimruang J, Worasakwutiphong S, Tansalarak R. Three-dimensional changes of maxillary alveolar morphology after using modified nasoalveolar molding in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2023;60(8):928-937.
Alqadi S, Qazali A, Altamimi R, Altamimi R, Abdouh I, Othman A, et al. Perception and attitude of parents of children with orofacial clefts regarding the use of presurgical orthopedics and feeding obturators. Cureus. 2023;15(9):e46131.
Alqadi S, Qazali A, Altamimi R, Altamimi R, Abdouh I, Othman A, et al. Perception and attitude of parents of children with orofacial clefts regarding the use of presurgical orthopedics and feeding obturators. Cureus. 2023;15(9):e46131.
Chaker SC, Hung YC, Saad M, Golinko MS, Galdyn IA. Easing the burden on caregivers-applications of artificial intelligence for physicians and caregivers of children with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2025;62(4):574-587.
Giap NV, Tuyen LN, Ha DV, Bach LH, Phuong LTM, Lan LTH, et al. Families’ awareness and attitudes towards children with cleft lip and palate in the northern provinces of Vietnam. Sri Lanka J Health. 2023;52(1):66-74.
Zhang Y, Zhang X, Jiang J, Xie W, Xiang D. Factors associated with perception of stigma among parents of children with cleft lip and palate: Cross-sectional study. JMIR Form Res. 2024;8:e53353.
Dash M, Mohapatra D, Dash K, Nayak S. Feeding interventions among cleft lip/palate infants: A systematic review and meta-synthesis. J Cleft Lip Palate Craniofac Anomalies. 2023;10(1):14-25.
Ndem IE, Kugar M, Caruso D, Duchesneau E, Agala CB, Mehta N, et al. A retrospective review on the effects of nasoalveolar molding on infant weight gain and time to primary lip repair in unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate. J Craniofac Surg. 2024;35(6):1652-1655.
María CA, María MC, Emilia CG. Maternal perception of breastfeeding in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate: a qualitative interpretative analysis. Int Breastfeed J. 2022;17(1):88.
Sischo L, Broder HL, Phillips C. Coping with cleft: a conceptual framework of caregiver responses to nasoalveolar molding. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2015;52(6):640-650.
Prakash B: Patient satisfaction. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2010;3(3):151-155.
Martínez-Orellana A, Camanes-Gonzalvo S, Tejero-Martínez A, Salom-Alonso L, Bellot-Arcís C, García-Sanz V, et al. Perception, attitude, and opinion of parents of cleft lip and palate patients treated with nasoalveolar molding (NAM): A cross-sectional questionnaire study. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2025;35(4):698-707.






