Assessing medical professionalism among students at Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy in 2023: A multi-method evaluation approach

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
PDF Download: 50 View: 79

Indexing

CÁC SỐ TỪ 2011-2023
Tạp chí Y Dược Học

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours related to medical professionalism among fifth-year medical students by using three assessment tools aligned with different competency levels in Miller’s Pyramid and to analyse correlations among these assessment approaches.

Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 401 fifth-year medical students at Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy. Three tools were used: (1) the Penn State College of Medicine Professionalism Questionnaire (PSCOM), (2) Barry’s scenario-based questionnaire, and (3) an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) evaluating communication and professionalism using standardised patients. Data were analysed using t-tests and Pearson correlation coefficients.

Results: The average scores (converted to a 100-point scale) were: PSCOM 81.3, Barry’s scenario-based questionnaire 45.5, and OSCE 79.0 (p<0.001). There were significant positive correlations between PSCOM and Barry’s scenario-based questionnaire (r=0.12; p<0.05) and between PSCOM and the OSCE score (r=0.16; p<0.01).

Conclusion: Assessment of medical professionalism should adopt a multidimensional, multi-method approach to comprehensively and objectively reflect learners’ competencies. It should also support a progressive evaluation process aligned with the advancing stages of professionalism training in medical education.

https://doi.org/10.34071/jmp.2025.2.22
Published 2025-05-09
Fulltext
PDF Download: 50 View: 79
Language
Issue Vol. 15 No. 2 (2025)
Section Original Articles
DOI 10.34071/jmp.2025.2.22
Keywords medical professionalism, assessment methods, self-reflection, scenario-based evaluation, OSCE, medical education

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Hue Journal of Medicine and Pharmacy

Nguyen, M. T., Truong, T. Q., Dang, D. T., Mai, T. X., Thai, M. Q., Phung, B. T., & Vo , D. T. (2025). Assessing medical professionalism among students at Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy in 2023: A multi-method evaluation approach. Hue Journal of Medicine and Pharmacy, 15(2), 155–160. https://doi.org/10.34071/jmp.2025.2.22

ABIM Foundation. ACP-ASIM Foundation; European Federation of Internal Medicine. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physician charter. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136(3):243-6.

Van Mook WN, Gorter SL, O’Sullivan H, Wass V, Schuwirth LW, van der Vleuten CP. Approaches to professional behaviour assessment: tools in the professionalism toolbox. Eur J Intern Med. 2009;20(8):e153-7.

Blackall GF, Melnick SA, Shoop GH, George J, Lerner SM, Wilson PK, et al. Professionalism in medical education: the development and validation of a survey instrument to assess attitudes toward professionalism. Med Teach. 2007;29(2-3):e58-62.

Shakour M, Badrian M. Assessment of professionalism between medical students in clinical situations. Int J Med Invest. 2015;4(2):199-207.

Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med. 1990;65(9 Suppl):S63-7.

Manzoor A, Baig LA, Aly SM. Attitudes of faculty and residents of surgical specialties towards professionalism at a tertiary care hospital of Islamabad. Pak J Med Sci. 2019;35(2):371-6.

Barry D, Cyran E, Anderson RJ. Common issues in medical professionalism: room to grow. Am J Med. 2000;108(2):136-42.

Salan A, Song CO, Mazlan NF, Hassin H, Lee LS, Abdullah MH. A pilot study on professionalism of future medical professionals in Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) Medical Centre. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2012;60:534-40.

Haque M, Zulkifli Z, Haque SZ, Kamal ZM, Salam A, Bhagat V, et al. Professionalism perspectives among medical students of a novel medical graduate school in Malaysia. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2016;7:407-22.

Wilkinson TJ, Wade WB, Knock LD. A blueprint to assess professionalism: results of a systematic review. Acad Med. 2009;84(5):551-8.

Shiga T, Nakashima Y, Norisue Y, Ikegami T, Uechi T, Otaki Y, et al. Comparison of professionalism between emergency medicine resident physicians and faculty physicians: A multicenter cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2020;15(3):e0230186.

Tokuda Y, Barnett PB, Norisue Y, Konishi R, Kudo H, Miyagi S. Questionnaire survey for challenging cases of medical professionalism in Japan. Med Teach. 2009;31(6):502-7.

Ten Cate O, Carraccio C, Damodaran A, Gofton W, Hamstra SJ, Hart DE, et al. Entrustment Decision Making: Extending Miller’s Pyramid. Acad Med. 2021;96(2):199-204.

Gaufberg EH, Batalden M, Sands R, Bell SK. The hidden curriculum: what can we learn from third-year medical student narrative reflections? Acad Med. 2010;85(11):1709-16.

Papadakis MA, Hodgson CS, Teherani A, Kohatsu ND. Unprofessional behavior in medical school is associated with subsequent disciplinary action by a state medical board. Acad Med. 2004;79(3):244-9.

Stern DT. Measuring Medical Professionalism. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.