Indexing
CÁC SỐ TỪ 2011-2023
Tạp chí Y Dược Học
Tóm tắt
Background: Prolonged labor is a risk factor for numerous maternal and fetal complications and is among the primary causes of operative vaginal delivery and emergency cesarean section. Predicting prolonged labor remains challenging. This study was conducted to determine the relationship between fetal head dimensions on ultrasound and the duration of labor as well as other outcomes in Vietnam.
Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 191 nulliparous women admitted for delivery at the Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital from January 2024 to April 2025. Independent samples t-test or Mann–Whitney U test was used for comparison, Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and ROC curve were analyzed to identify cut-off points for predicting the risk of cesarean section due to a prolonged second stage of labor.
Results: There were 34/191 cases of cesarean section during the second stage. Fetal head dimensions in the cesarean section group were significantly larger than those in the vaginal delivery group (p<0.001). There was a weak positive correlation between biparietal diameter, head circumference and the duration of the second stage (p<0.001). Biparietal diameter and head circumference were larger in cases of complex perineal tears. The Area Under the Curve for biparietal diameter and head circumference in predicting cesarean section due to prolonged second stage was 0.718 and 0.704, respectively.
Conclusion: Ultrasound measurement of fetal head dimensions has prognostic value for adverse maternal labor outcomes.
| Đã xuất bản | 25-08-2026 | |
| Toàn văn |
|
|
| Ngôn ngữ |
|
|
| Số tạp chí | Tập 16 Số 04 (2026) | |
| Phân mục | Nghiên cứu | |
| DOI | 10.34071/jmp.2026.4.911 | |
| Từ khóa | cesarean section, prolonged labor, fetal head biometry mổ lấy thai, chuyển dạ kéo dài, kích thước đầu thai nhi |
công trình này được cấp phép theo Creative Commons Attribution-phi thương mại-NoDerivatives 4.0 License International .
Bản quyền (c) 2026 Tạp chí Y Dược Huế
Pergialiotis V, Bellos I, Antsaklis A, Papapanagiotou A, Loutradis D, Daskalakis G. Maternal and neonatal outcomes following a prolonged second stage of labor: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;252:62-69. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018.
Maaloe N, Bygbjerg IC, Onesmo R, Secher NJ, Sorensen BL. Disclosing doubtful indications for emergency cesarean sections in rural hospitals in Tanzania: a retrospective criterion-based audit. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91(9):1069-76. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01474.x.
Bjelke M, Thurn L, Oscarsson M. Prolonged passive second stage of labor in nulliparous women-prevalence and risk factors: a historical cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022;101(5):499-505. doi:10.1111/aogs.14342.
Bardin R, Aviram A, Meizner I, Ashwal E, Hiersch L, Yogev Y, et al. Association of fetal biparietal diameter with mode of delivery and perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(2):217-23. doi:10.1002/uog.14837.
Salman L, Shmueli A, Aviram A, Hiersch L, Chen R, Gabbay-Benziv R. The association between neonatal head circumference and second stage duration. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(24):4086-92. doi:10.1080/14767058.2018.1481386.
Cao Ngoc Thanh, Phan Thi Thanh Diem. Nghiên cứu đặc điểm và kết quả kết thúc chuyển dạ ở các trường hợp chuyển dạ đình trệ tại Khoa Phụ sản, Bệnh viện Trường Đại học Y - Dược Huế. Tạp chí Phụ sản. 2023;21(2):72-77. doi:10.46755/vjog.2023.2.1597.
Shinohara S, Amemiya A, Takizawa M. Fetal biparietal diameter as a potential risk factor for emergency cesarean section due to labor arrest. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2020;250(3):161-6. doi:10.1620/tjem.250.161.
World Health Organization. WHO labour care guide: user's manual. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240017566
Huynh Thi Nhu Ngoc, Nguyen Tran Thao Nguyen. Nghiên cứu một số yếu tố liên quan và kết cục thai kì ở những thai phụ có thai to tại Khoa Phụ sản Bệnh viện Trường Đại học Y - Dược Huế. Tạp chí Phụ sản. 2023;21(3):50-59.
Dall'Asta A, Ramirez Zegarra R, Corno E, Mappa I, Lu JLA, Di Pasquo E, et al. Role of fetal head-circumference-to-maternal-height ratio in predicting cesarean section for labor dystocia: prospective multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023;61(1):93-8. doi:10.1002/uog.24981.
Elvander C, Hogberg U, Ekeus C. The influence of fetal head circumference on labor outcome: a population-based register study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91(4):470-5. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01358.x.
Karaaslan O, Islamova G, Soylemez F, Kalafat E. Ultrasound in labor admission to predict need for emergency cesarean section: a prospective, blinded cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021;34(12):1991-8. doi:10.1080/14767058.2019.1687682.
Ostborg TB, Romundstad PR, Eggebo TM. Duration of the active phase of labor in spontaneous and induced labors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(1):120-7. doi:10.1111/aogs.13039.
Yagel O, Cohen SM, Lipschuetz M, Bdolah-Abram T, Amsalem H, Kabiri D, et al. Higher rates of operative delivery and maternal and neonatal complications in persistent occiput posterior position with a large head circumference: a retrospective cohort study. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2018;44(1):51-8. doi:10.1159/000478010.
Meyer R, Rottenstreich A, Shapira M, Alcalay M, Ram E, Yinon Y, et al. The role of fetal head circumference in the formation of obstetric anal sphincter injuries following vacuum deliveries among primiparous women. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020;301(6):1423-9. doi:10.1007/s00404-020-05558-7.
Ortega MV, Kim Y, Leung K, Weinstein M, Leftwich HK. Can sonographic fetal head circumference measurement help predict obstetric anal sphincter injury? Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022;159(1):279-83. doi:10.1002/ijgo.14098.
Mohd Raihan FS, Kusuma J, Nasution AA. Neonatal head circumference as a risk factor for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023;5(8):101047. doi:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101047.