Evaluating the effectiveness of hybrid simulation in the practice of medicine (POM) module at University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University

Tải xuống

Dữ liệu tải xuống chưa có sẵn.
PDF (English) Download: 0 View: 0

Indexing

CÁC SỐ TỪ 2011-2023
Tạp chí Y Dược Học

Tóm tắt

Background: Competency-based medical education is a central direction in modern medical training, in which hybrid simulation is considered an effective method to create a safe learning environment and enhance clinical skills. Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy has implemented hybrid simulation in the practice of medicine module; however, its application remains limited.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of hybrid simulation on third-year medical students in this module at Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy

Materials and methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted involving 100 third-year medical students who received integrated simulation-based training, compared with a control group of 300 third-year medical students trained using the traditional teaching method, with the same clinical skills being taught in both groups. The class was designed based on the ADDIE model. Data were collected by using the Educational Practices Questionnaire and OSCE scores, and analyzed using SPSS version 26.0 with statistical significance set at p < 0.05

Results: Students reported positive experiences with hybrid simulation, with mean scores ranging from 4.18 to 4.48; learning effectiveness was rated highest. OSCE results showed that the intervention group scored higher in the gynecological examination skills station, while the control group performed better in the vertex delivery skills station.

Conclusion: Students had positive learning experiences with hybrid simulation. Further refinement of scenarios and procedures is needed, along with randomized studies for more comprehensive evaluation.

https://doi.org/10.34071/jmp.2026.4.937
Đã xuất bản 25-08-2026
Toàn văn
PDF (English) Download: 0 View: 0
Ngôn ngữ
Số tạp chí Tập 16 Số 04 (2026)
Phân mục Nghiên cứu
DOI 10.34071/jmp.2026.4.937
Từ khóa Competency-based medical education, simulation-based medical education, hybrid simulation, practice of medicine module

Creative Commons License

công trình này được cấp phép theo Creative Commons Attribution-phi thương mại-NoDerivatives 4.0 License International .

Bản quyền (c) 2026 Tạp chí Y Dược Huế

Ho, T. T. H., Tran, T. N. B., Nguyen, T. K. A., Vinh, K., Nguyen, H. M., & Nguyen, V. Q. H. (2026). Evaluating the effectiveness of hybrid simulation in the practice of medicine (POM) module at University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University. Tạp Chí Y Dược Huế, 16(04), 178–184. https://doi.org/10.34071/jmp.2026.4.937

Frank JR, Snell LS, Cate OT, Holmboe ES, Carraccio C, Swing SR, et al. Competency-based medical education: theory to practice. Med Teach. 2010;32(8):638-45. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.501190.

Leiphrakpam PD, Are C. Competency-based medical education (CBME): an overview and relevance to the education of future surgical oncologists. Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2025;16(2):382-92. doi: 10.1007/s13193-023-01716-w.

Chuang L-L, Hsieh M-C. A competency-based approach to critical care education. Tzu Chi Medical Journal. 2018;30(3):148-51. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_84_18.

Hsiao C-T, Chou FC, Hsieh C-C, Chang LC, Hsu C-M. Developing a competency-based learning and assessment system for residency training: analysis study of user requirements and acceptance. Journal of medical Internet research. 2020;22(4):e15655. doi: 10.2196/15655.

Zafošnik U, Cerovečki V, Stojnić N, Belec AP, Klemenc-Ketiš Z. Developing a competency framework for training with simulations in healthcare: a qualitative study. BMC Medical Education. 2024;24(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05139-1.

Nakashima M. Hybrid simulation: an early history. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. 2020;49(10):949-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3274.

Brown WJ, Tortorella RA. Hybrid medical simulation–a systematic literature review. Smart Learning Environments. 2020;7(1):16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00127-6

Le Lous M, Simon O, Lassel L, Lavoue V, Jannin P. Hybrid simulation for obstetrics training: a systematic review. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2020;246:23-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.12.024.

Elendu C, Amaechi DC, Okatta AU, Amaechi EC, Elendu TC, Ezeh CP, et al. The impact of simulation-based training in medical education: A review. Medicine. 2024;103(27):e38813. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038813.

Unal E, Ozdemir A. The effect of hybrid simulated burn care training on nursing students' knowledge, skills, and empathy: A randomised controlled trial. Nurse Education Today. 2023;126:105828. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105828.

Duong DB, Phan T, Trung NQ, Le BN, Do HM, Nguyen HM, et al. Innovations in medical education in Vietnam. BMJ Innovations. 2021;7(Suppl 1). DOI:10.1136/bmjinnov-2021-000708

Tran TD, Vu PM, Pham HTM, Au LN, Do HP, Doan HTT, et al. Transforming medical education to strengthen the health professional training in Viet Nam: A case study. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2022;27:100543. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100543.

Duong DB, Nguyen TA, Goodell K, Osman NY, Nguyen TM, Pham V-AT, et al. Undergraduate medical education reform in Viet Nam for a primary health care workforce. Annals of global health. 2022;88(1):100. doi: 10.5334/aogh.3755.

Li CL, Abidin MJBZ. Instructional design of classroom instructional skills based on the ADDIE model. Technium Soc Sci J. 2024;55:167. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v55i1.10676

Harden RM. Ten questions to ask when planning a course or curriculum. Medical education. 1986;20(4):356-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1986.tb01379.x

Sawyer T, Eppich W, Brett-Fleegler M, Grant V, Cheng A. More than one way to debrief: a critical review of healthcare simulation debriefing methods. Simulation in Healthcare. 2016;11(3):209-17. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000148.

Zapko KA, Ferranto MLG, Blasiman R, Shelestak D. Evaluating best educational practices, student satisfaction, and self-confidence in simulation: A descriptive study. Nurse education today. 2018;60:28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.09.006

Franklin AE, Burns P, Lee CS. Psychometric testing on the NLN Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning, Simulation Design Scale, and Educational Practices Questionnaire using a sample of pre-licensure novice nurses. Nurse education today. 2014;34(10):1298-304. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.06.011

Alhawiti NM. The Influence of Active Learning on the Development of Learner Capabilities in the College of Applied Medical Sciences: Mixed-Methods Study. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2023;14:87-99. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S392875.

Cant RP, Cooper SJ. Use of simulation-based learning in undergraduate nurse education: An umbrella systematic review. Nurse education today. 2017;49:63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.015

Fanning RM, Gaba DM. The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simulation in healthcare. 2007;2(2):115-25. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3180315539

Dreifuerst KT. Using debriefing for meaningful learning to foster development of clinical reasoning in simulation. Journal of Nursing Education. 2012;51(6):326-33. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20120409-02

Cook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Szostek JH, Wang AT, et al. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jama. 2011;306(9):978-88. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1234.

Mitchell AA, Ivimey-Cook ER. Technology-enhanced simulation for healthcare professionals: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Medicine. 2023;10:1149048. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1149048.

Fung JTC, Zhang W, Yeung MN, Pang MTH, Lam VSF, Chan BKY, et al. Evaluation of students' perceived clinical competence and learning needs following an online virtual simulation education programme with debriefing during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Nursing Open. 2021;8(6):3045-54. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1017.

Le QC, Bui MH, Khuong QL, Le PA, Tran DT, Nguyen Vu QH, et al. Developing institutional policies for health professionals' education reform: a case study of medical education in Viet Nam. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2025;57:101551. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2025.101551.

Barry Issenberg S, Mcgaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Lee Gordon D, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Medical teacher. 2005;27(1):10-28. doi: 10.1080/01421590500046924.

Cevik AA, Abu-Zidan F. Clinical procedure experience of medical students improves their objective structured clinical examination station scores in emergency medicine clerkship. Cureus. 2019;11(11). doi: 10.7759/cureus.6261

Chen F, Carter TB, Maguire DP, Blanchard EE, Martinelli SM, Isaak RS. Experience is the teacher of all things: prior participation in anesthesiology OSCEs enhances communication of treatment options with simulated high-risk patients. The Journal of Education in Perioperative Medicine: JEPM. 2019;21(3):E626. PMID: 31988987.

Manley K, Edwards S, Mears J, Siassakos D. Hybrid simulation compared to manikin alone in teaching pelvic examinations: a randomised control trial. BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning. 2016;2(1):6. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2015-000078.

Lindsay Miller J, Avery MD, Larson K, Woll A, VonAchen A, Mortenson A. Emergency birth hybrid simulation with standardized patients in midwifery education: implementation and evaluation. Journal of midwifery & women's health. 2015;60(3):298-303. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12276.